Friday, April 14, 2023

The Writing is on the Wall

 


Under the reductionist semiotic schema of the System Wide Action Plan (SWAP) being implemented under the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) of the UN, the objective is to manipulate the Indigenous Peoples into venues of "participation" via a global indigenous bureaucracy of the seven-region system that first appeared in Alta, Norway at the Global Indigenous Preparatory Conference in 2013.

 

United Nations

System Wide Action Plan

 

Participation

is

Not

PRESENCE

 

Treaty of Tordesillas 1494

DOWNLOAD PDF


After the Global Indigenous Preparatory Conference of 2013 in Alta, Norway the UN General Assembly convened a High-Level Plenary Meeting (HLPM) in 2014 which was fraudulently called a World Conference on Indigenous Peoples.  The outcome document of this High-Level Plenary is the source of the mandate for the System Wide Action Plan.


The UN completely ignored the interventions at Alta made by Indigenous Peoples that explicitly called for principles, criteria and guarantees for engagement without discrimination.


“We call for the restitution of the primary source materials and testimony that was lent to the United Nations system as fundamental to the evidence in document form of the systemic (system to system) nature of the legal relationships between the Nations of Indigenous Peoples and the member states of the UN system for the purpose of the Treaty Study (1999) conducted by Dr. Miguel Alfonso Martinez of Cuba.


Such delivery, should be initial act of good faith in terms of the continuing process of systemic documentation among the Nations of Indigenous Peoples and the UN system prior to and as a necessary act of condition to allow for the full and effective participation of the Indigenous Peoples with the High Level Plenary Meeting on an equal basis and without systemic discrimination in the process of producing the Final Outcome Document of the High Level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly 2014.”


In spite of the opposition of and Denial of Consent by the Indigenous Peoples to this blatant violation of the right to self-determination, the UN member states and the minions of the “hangers around the UN” blatantly dictate to the Indigenous Peoples and the international community, demanding that the term “World Conference on Indigenous Peoples” identify the 2014 fraud.


Challenges to this concept are not allowed.

 


It is a conceptual concentration camp; a global reservation system being constructed under the SWAP to reduce the inherent rights of the Original Nations of Indigenous Peoples to a delegated privilege to be defined at the domestic level within the legislative context of each state and country, all constrained by the insertion of the trump card of Article 46 at the last minute into the UN version of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (Not the original version of the declaration as agreed and approved in 1994.)


Challenging the High-level Plenary Meeting (UNHLPM) of the UN in 2014 the Indigenous Peoples demanded an end to discrimination and violations of the right to self-determination, calling for and full and equal participation of Indigenous Peoples, equal to all other peoples in the concept, design, implementation, and evaluation of each and every one of the UN actions and policies that involve our Indigenous Peoples and the protection of our collective rights. 

 

In evaluating with these same criteria the UNHLPM 2014, the lack of respect and consideration to be considered in Equality as Peoples with all other peoples in the proceedings was evident from conception, completely absent from the design, not even being considered in the implementation, and there are no mechanisms to integrate equality in the evaluation of the HLPM 2014 which was not and still today in 2023 is not a UN conference. 

The event was characterized by individual advisors being selected by extractive and non-representational processes, international peons whose role in the projected UN High Level Plenary Meeting of States of the General Assembly is to repeat what the states have scripted to be narrated, facilitating the assault of the global neo-liberal colonization by the corporations that dictate the policies of the states, and whose role is to provide legitimacy for development projects which the international financial consortia require in order to market the concept that there is justice and consent of Indigenous Peoples.

 

The UN General Assembly High-level Plenary Meeting 2014

WAS NOT A UN CONFERENCE.


The UNHLPM of 2014 is a schema of the states which is actively and openly but unrealistically being promoted to be named an official UN conference, in the same degrading naming process of European American colonization that we became known as Indians, Americans, American Indians, Latin America, etc. 


The naming of the HLPM as an official UN Conference is a semiotic schema (doctrine) being constructed to contextualize and manufacture the process of indigenous consent via bureaucratic venues of participation within the Westphalian System of the Divine Right of States [UN] in order to reduce and domesticate the Universal Human Rights in International Law of Indigenous Peoples, equal to all other peoples of the world.

 

The branding of  the 2014 UN High-Level Plenary Meeting as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples is today the equivalent of the edicts by the Vatican known as the Alexandrian Papal Bulls (Inter Caetera 1493) which literally un-named (terra nullius) and then re-named [Doctrine of Discovery-America] entire sacred histories and geographies of the Original Nations of Indigenous Peoples of the world.


At the 2014 World Conference on Indigenous Peoples, the General Assembly requested the development of a system-wide action plan for a coherent approach to achieving the ends of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. The Secretary-General shared a finalized system-wide action plan with heads of UN system agencies at the United Nations Chief Executives Board meeting in November 2015, and encouraged concerted efforts to implement the action plan.

************************

Background: Outcome document of the high-level plenary meeting of the General Assembly known as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples (2014)

 

40. We request the Secretary-General, in consultation with the Inter-Agency Support Group on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues and Member States, taking into account the views expressed by indigenous peoples, to report to the General Assembly at its seventieth session on the implementation of the present outcome document, and to submit at the same session, through the Economic and Social Council, recommendations regarding how to use, modify and improve existing United Nations mechanisms to achieve the ends of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ways to enhance a coherent, system-wide approach to achieving the ends of the Declaration and specific proposals to enable the participation of indigenous peoples’ representatives and institutions, building on his report on ways and means of promoting participation at the United Nations of indigenous peoples’ representatives on the issues affecting them.


The outcome document of the 2014 World Conference on Indigenous Peoples contains a series of commitments calling for multifaceted action by a range of actors, first and foremost Member States, but also the United Nations system. Among these is a request that the Secretary-General develop a system wide action plan to ensure a coherent approach to achieving the ends of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (A/RES/69/2, paragraph 311). The outcome document also requests the designation of an existing senior official of the UN system responsible for coordinating the action plan, raising awareness of the rights of indigenous peoples at the highest possible level, as well as increasing the coherence of the activities of the UN system in this regard. The Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs was designated to this position and has coordinated the development of this action plan.


Full text of paragraph 31:


We request the Secretary-General, in consultation and cooperation with indigenous peoples, the Inter-Agency Support Group on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues and Member States, to begin the development, within existing resources, of a system-wide action plan to ensure a coherent approach to achieving the ends of the Declaration and to report to the General Assembly at its seventieth session, through the Economic and Social Council, on progress made. We invite the Secretary-General to accord, by the end of the seventieth session of the Assembly, an existing senior official of the United Nations system, with access to the highest levels of decision-making within the system, responsibility for coordinating the action plan, raising awareness of the rights of indigenous peoples at the highest possible level and increasing the coherence of the activities of the system in this regard.


This action plan was developed by the Inter-Agency Support Group on Indigenous Issues (IASG) over the course of 10 months in 2015 and was finalized at the annual meeting of the IASG on 26-27 October 2015. It was introduced by the Secretary-General to the Chief Executives Board at its meeting on 18 November 2015.


In preparation of the action plan and under the guidance of the Under-Secretary-General, the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) organized consultations with Member States, indigenous peoples, representatives of UN agencies, funds and programmes, the three UN mechanisms with specific mandates concerning indigenous peoples and others. Throughout these consultations the need for further awareness-raising on the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and for capacity-building to implement its provisions has been highlighted as a central concern. This concern has been raised in relation to the UN system as well as among Member States, indigenous peoples themselves and the broader societies in which they live. The consultations also identified the need for concerted action to implement the Declaration, especially at the country level. The full and effective participation of indigenous people in processes that affect them is another issue that has been a priority for indigenous peoples and is a principle that is recognized and supported by Member States. The action plan seeks to address these issues.


Based on the feedback received, the plan focuses on the following action areas:

(1) raise awareness on the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and indigenous issues;

 

(2) support the implementation of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, particularly at the country level;


(3) Support the realization of indigenous peoples’ rights in the implementation and review of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development;


(4) conduct a mapping exercise of existing policies, standards, guidelines, activities, resources and capacities within the UN and multilateral system to identify opportunities and gaps;

 

(5) develop capacities of States, indigenous peoples, civil society and UN personnel at all levels; and

 

(6) support the participation of indigenous peoples in processes that affect them.

 

The primary aim of this action plan is to increase UN system coherence in addressing the rights and well-being of indigenous peoples in its work, including in support of Member States, with the ultimate goal of implementing, with the effective participation of indigenous peoples, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples at all levels. This action plan is aimed to promote improved support to Member States as well as indigenous peoples themselves. Particular attention is paid to the UN system using its convening capacity to facilitate dialogue and co-operation between state actors and indigenous peoples, promoting indigenous peoples’ participation in global, regional and national processes that affect them, while supporting Member States to take into account indigenous peoples’ rights and views in line with international standards.

 

 

United Nations Permanent Forum for Indigenous Peoples

12th Session May 18-31, 2013

Collective Statement

by

Abya Yala Caucus

Maya Vision, Centro Cultural Techantit

TONATIERRA


With the adoption of UN GA1514 in 1960 and the adoption in 2007 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and in terms of the dual mandates regarding Human Rights which brings us together here today, a persistent challenge in our dialogue continues to be the fact that the political arguments on both sides of the issue are in conflict, not just because of the doctrines of power that gave birth to the concepts of dominion which define the states and the social relations of their member constituencies and international systems such as the UN, but also because the framework for resolution of the issues within the UN system is incompetent to address the spirituality of the earth based territorial realities of the Indigenous Nations, and the system itself is incoherent according to the geographic sciences of modern times.


What is lacking is a mechanism to define the issues in common terms, outside of the intellectual framework of colonization and dominion. What is missing is a clarification of the concept of territorial integrity, as a dimension of ecological and social sustainability and not a bastard relic from the intellectual Regime of Doctrines spawned by the Divine Right of Kings.

 

**************

Recommendations

 

1.  To implement the call made by the Permanent Forum to repudiate the Doctrine of Discovery by appointing a Special Rapporteur to advance the Preliminary Study on the Impact of the Doctrine of Discovery commissioned by the Permanent Forum into an international study with recommendations on how the study may advance the Human Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

 

2. To call for the restitution of the Treaty Archive of primary source materials and testimonies lent to the United Nations by the Indigenous Peoples for the purposes of the Treaty Study accomplished by Dr. Miguel Alfonso Martinez, to be made accessible globally via the information technologies now available and to the diverse Caucus of Indigenous Peoples participating in the Permanent Forum and other bodies of the UN system.

 

3.  To take all necessary and appropriate actions mandated under UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 in terms of the Right of Self Determination necessary to defend and protect the Human Rights of the Future Generations of Indigenous Peoples, Equal to all other Peoples, with recognition and respect for the Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth with the Natural World.

 

4.  To address the violations of Human Rights implicit in the antiquated geographic systems of the States and the planetary cognitive derivatives of their International Borders, by adopting the recommendations of the Declaration of Abya Yala by the Abya Yala Caucus as a necessary decolonization strategy in terms of Education and Human Rights, as referred to in previous sessions of this body.

 

5.  To act immediately to reaffirm the principles of the UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples which are violated by the continued designation of this forum as a Forum on Indigenous Issues, by adopting the title of this body as the United Nations Forum for Indigenous Peoples.

 


TONATIERRA

www.tonatierra.org

 


World Water: ONE

www.www.www

 *****************

ANNEX

 

STATEMENT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ CAUCUS


THIRTEENTH SESSION OF THE
UNITED NATIONS PERMANENT FORUM ON INDIGENOUS ISSUES
May 12 To 23, 2014
UN Headquarters, New York

STATEMENT OF THE
NORTH AMERICAN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ CAUCUS


Agenda Item 6:  UN High Level Plenary Meeting that is not a World Conference on Indigenous Peoples

Thank you Madame Chair.  As co-chair, I am honored to give this statement on behalf of the North American Indigenous Peoples’ Caucus.  The North American Indigenous Peoples Caucus (NAIPC) met on March 1st and 2nd, 2014 at Thompson Rivers University, in the traditional territory of the Secwepemcúľcw Nation.  The meeting was hosted by the Shuswap Nation Tribal Council and Neskonlith Indian Band.  The NAIPC meeting was attended by over 90 representatives from 41 Indigenous Peoples’ Nations and organizations.

 
 
AGENDA ITEM 6:  Discussion on the High Level Plenary (HLP) To Be Known As the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples (WCIP)

32.   NAIPC will engage other regions and caucuses to move toward a global consensus on the cancellation of the HLP also known as the WCIP. The following text is the consensus position reached by the NAIPC calling for the cancellation of the High Level Plenary Meeting (HLPM) to be known as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples (WCIP): 

In March of 2013, at the NAIPC meeting at Sycuan, we established, through consensus, standards of analysis and review regarding the proposed UN high-level plenary meeting (HLPM), also known as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples (WCIP). These standards were applied by the North American delegation at the meeting in Alta, Norway in June of 2013. The bedrock of the NAIPC position regarding Indigenous Peoples participation in the HLPM is that participation must be FULL and EQUAL. We decided last March that we would revisit the question of the HLPM at the 2014 NAIPC meeting, and decide upon any further participation in planning or participating in the HLPM.

In the months following the Alta meeting and in particular on February 26, 2013, the President of the General Assembly (PGA), has made it clear in an Aide Memoir that equal and effective participation by Indigenous Peoples WILL NOT be allowed at the HLPM. Therefore, the NAIPC conditions that were established at Sycuan, and that were reiterated at Alta, have not been respected and have been ignored by the PGA. Given this chain of events, and given the short timeline between now and the scheduled HLPM, we do not foresee our conditions for participation as equals in the HLPM being met.

Therefore, the NAIPC calls for the immediate cancellation of the HLPM by the UN General Assembly.  We also call on the state of Mexico to cancel its planned technical meeting to begin drafting the outcome document for the HLPM-WCIP; we call on the UNPFII to cancel any further participation and additional preparatory or advisory meetings for the HLPM. Additionally, NAIPC advances the position throughout Great Turtle Island, and to the world's Indigenous Peoples, to call for the cancellation of the HLPM, and to withhold any and all support and participation. We call for the withdrawal of any support, active or tacit, for the HLPM by Indigenous Peoples anywhere in the world.

33. By consensus the above text was agreed upon and it was decided that the NAIPC will call for cancellation of the HLPM and withdraw from the Global Coordinating Group of the HLPM/WCIP. Debra Harry and Kenneth Deer, the two NAIPC representatives to the GCG will go to New York to deliver this message to a group of states on Tuesday March 4th, after which time the NAIPC formally withdraws from the GCG.

YouTube:

 **************

Aucan Huilcaman: Message to North American Indigenous Peoples Caucus


Message to the North American Indigenous Peoples Caucus

From: Aucan Huilcaman Paillama,
Mapuche Nation
March 23, 2014

 
Dear Debra Harry,

 
Thank you very much for the recent communication.

I have taken note of the NAIPC meeting held on March 3, 2014. Likewise I congratulate you along with Kenneth Deer on the decision to forgo participation in the Global Coordinating Group (GCG) given that there is no guarantee for real participation in the so-called World Conference of Indigenous Peoples and that in practice it is not a proper World Conference itself, but simply a High Level Plenary Meeting within the framework of the United Nations General Assembly.

I have also taken note that the North American Indigenous Caucus has called for cancellation of the High Level Plenary Meeting.  This decision is a valiant expression of will in order to safeguard the dignity of Indigenous Peoples and make manifest that we are not willing to continue supporting new forms of colonialism and the domestication of Indigenous Peoples in violation of our rights.  This is the most appropriate form in exercise of the right of indigenous consent.

From the beginning I expressed my serious and profound questions regarding the true meaning and scope of the High Level Plenary Meeting, considering that all procedures of a real and legitimate World Conference within the UN system were being violated.  I authored an article called "An Apparent World Conference, a parenthesis in the General Assembly of the United Nations."  Time has proven me right.  Likewise the international Indigenous leadership also shoulders direct responsibility for the consequences of events. It would be appropriate and healthy should those indigenous who supported this event without reservation, undergo their own self-criticism in light of the facts. 

The Languagee of the Land: The Mapuche Nation

The Right to Free, Prior Informed Consent is a right that depends exclusively and excludingly to Indigenous Peoples. I think it is the right time to manifest clearly that we DO NOT CONSENT to this manner of participation, otherwise a very negative precedent will be set for the future of Indigenous Peoples.  Taking also consideration that as we are entitled to the right of self-determination as peoples, but we if we do not have the capacity to exercise the totality of these rights, this would make evident the lack of capacity to exercise the determination to DENY CONSENT. From the point of view of law, consent is the last right held by Indigenous Peoples in terms of internal jurisdiction and is the last resort that we have as precaution, protection and safeguard for the rights and fundamental freedoms for future generations of indigenous peoples wherever they may be found.  If in the final analysis if we are not clear on the exercise of the right of CONSENT, it would then become clear that domestication has prevailed because we have failed to properly utilize the ultimate right to DENY CONSENT.

Women without Borders 5 day Protest Ride

At this stage of events, even should greater indigenous participation be achieved, it would not be sufficient, because there is no certainty regarding the results of the High Level Plenary Meeting, which is to say there is no certainty regarding the Final Declaration, and there is no certainty on a Plan of Action.  Unfortunately, very little is being brought forward towards obtaining a document useful for Indigenous Peoples.  With such things as they are, the most likely possibility is that the High-level Plenary Meeting will benefit mostly the government states.  This would bring to account a particular naivety on the part of indigenous leaders considering the actions that states have historically had with Indigenous Peoples and in violation of our rights.
 
 
What is happening today with the High Level Plenary Meeting reflects two fundamental issues.  On the one hand, the absolute absence of a SELF DETERMINED INDIGENOUS AGENDA, whose absence is reflected in efforts that focus primarily on UN participation and which often occurs without considering the consequences for the future of Indigenous Peoples.  Secondly, there are some indigenous organizations (international networks - coordinators) whose performances are solely and preferably centered around the agenda of the United Nations, and this latter case is almost pathetic, although it is known to everyone. 

The news about the postponement of the meeting sponsored by the government of Mexico for the first days of April 2014 highlights the uncertainties concerning the outcome of the meeting, although the more important issue is the utility of the results of the High Level Plenary Meeting itself.

Although the President of the General Assembly of the United Nations Mr. John Ashe has requested the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues for greater number of persons for consultations, this is inadequate and inappropriate due to the fact that the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues is a subsidiary body of the ECOSOC and we Indigenous Peoples have the right to actively participate in all matters that affect us without any intermediation.

I would like to report that the Mapuche in Chile, both the Council of All Lands, and the Mapuche Pact for Self-Determination (PACMA) will have a meeting with the government of Chile to manifest these critical points and call for the cancellation of the High-level Plenary Meeting, and if possible prepare the ground for the future in order to achieve a real and legitimate World Conference on Indigenous Peoples.
Enc. International Relations
Council of All Lands – Mapuche Nation
 
 

(Translation: TONATIERRA)
YouTube:
Mapuche Nation 
 *************

Mensaje al Caucus Indígena de Norte América

De parte de Aucan Huicaman Paillama, Nación Mapuche
23 marzo 2014 

Estimada Debra Harry,

Muchas gracias por la comunicación recién.

He tomado conocimiento de la reunión efectuada el día 03 de marzo de 2014. De la misma manera quisiera felicitar a Ud., junto a Kenneth Deer la decisión de renunciar a la participación en el Grupo Coordinador Global (GCG) teniendo en cuenta que no hay garantía para la participación en la denominada Conferencia Mundial de los Pueblos Indígenas y que en la práctica no es una Conferencia Mundial propiamente tal, sino, simplemente una Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel en el marco de la Asamblea General de Naciones Unidas.

También me he informado que el Caucus Indígena de Norte América ha solicitado la Cancelación de la Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel. Esta decisión constituye una valiente manifestación de voluntad que salvaguarda la dignidad de los Pueblos Indígenas y pone de manifiesto que, no están dispuestos a seguir soportando nuevas formas de colonialismo y domesticación con  los Pueblos Indígenas y sus derechos.   Es la forma más apropiada de ejercer el consentimiento indígena.


Desde un inicio manifesté mis serias y profundas dudas del verdadero sentido y alcance de la Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel, considerando que se habían vulnerado todos los procedimientos de una verdadera y legítima Conferencia Mundial dentro del sistema de Naciones Unidas. Mi artículo se denominó “Una Aparente Conferencia Mundial” y en el mejor de los casos un “Paréntesis en la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas”. El tiempo me ha dado la razón. De la misma manera la dirigencia indígena internacional también tiene una responsabilidad directa en las consecuencias de los hechos. Sería oportuno y saludable que los indígenas que apoyaron sin reserva este evento, hagan sus propias autocriticas a la luz de los hechos.



El derecho al Consentimiento Previo Libre e Informado, es un derecho que depende exclusiva y excluyentemente a los Pueblos Indígenas, considero que es el momento apropiado para manifestar claramente que NO CONSENTIMOS, este tipo de participación, de lo contrario se sentará un precedente muy negativo para el futuro de los Pueblos Indígenas, considerando además, que somos titulares del derecho a la libre determinación, sino tenemos capacidad de ejercer este conjunto de derechos, se pondrá de relieve la falta de capacidad para ejercer la voluntad para NO CONSENTIR. Desde el punto de vista del derecho, el consentimiento, es el último derecho que poseen los Pueblos Indígenas en su fuero interno y es el último recurso que disponemos para cautelar, proteger y salvaguardar los derechos y libertades fundamentales para las futuras generaciones indígenas en donde quiera que se encuentren. Si eventualmente no somos claros en ejercer el CONSENTIMIENTO, daría cuenta que ha prevalecido la domesticación porque no hemos sabido utilizar apropiadamente el último derecho que disponemos a NO CONSENTIR.
 

A estas alturas de los hechos, aunque se logrará una mayor participación indígena, no es suficiente, debido a que no hay certeza de los resultados de la Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel, es decir, no hay certeza para una Declaración Final y no hay certeza sobre un Plan de Acción. Lamentablemente y de manera muy escasa se están desplegando  esfuerzos orientados a obtener un documento útil para los Pueblos Indígenas. Tal cual están las cosas posiblemente la Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel servirá más a los gobiernos. Esto dará cuenta de una cierta ingenuidad de parte de los líderes indígenas teniendo en cuenta las actuaciones que han tenido históricamente los Estados con los Pueblos Indígenas y sus derechos. 

Lo que está sucediendo en la actualidad con la Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel, refleja dos cuestiones fundamentales. Por un lado, la ausencia absoluta de una AGENDA PROPIAMENTE INDÍGENA, cuya ausencia se refleja en centrar los esfuerzos prioritariamente en la participación y muchas veces se participa sin medir las consecuencias para el futuro de los Pueblos Indígenas y en segundo lugar hay algunas organizaciones indígenas (redes-coordinaciones internacionales) sus actuaciones  están única y preferentemente centrados alrededor de la agenda de las Naciones Unidas, esto último, es casi patético, aunque es conocido por todos. 

La noticia sobre la posposición de la Reunión patrocinada por el gobierno de México para los primeros días de abril 2014, pone de relieve la falta de certeza sobre los resultados de la Reunión, aunque lo más importante está referido a la utilidad de los resultados de la Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel. 

Aunque el Presidente de la Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas Sr. John Ashe pida al Foro Permanente sobre Cuestiones Indígenas un mayor número de personas para las Consultas, resulta insuficiente y no apropiado porque el Foro Permanente sobre Cuestiones Indígenas es un órgano subsidiario del ECOSOC y  los indígenas tenemos derecho a participar activamente en todos los asuntos que nos afectan sin intermediación alguna.


Quisiera informar que los Mapuche en Chile, tanto, el Consejo de Todas las Tierras, el Pacto Mapuche por la Autodeterminación (PACMA) tendremos una reunión con el gobierno de Chile para manifestar los puntos críticos y pedir la cancelación de  la Reunión Plenaria de Alto Nivel. Y en lo posible preparar el terreno para el futuro y alcanzar una verdadera y legítima Conferencia Mundial sobre Pueblos Indígenas.
 

AUCAN HUILCAMAN PAILLAMA
Enc. Relaciones Internacionales
Consejo de Todas las Tierras – Nación Mapuche


*****************************

TONATIERRA: The HLPM 2014 and the Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth


Territorial  Integrity  of  Mother Earth
The
TIME
Is
NOW
Recommendation to the 13th Session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Peoples

12-23 May 2014   UN Headquarters   New York

The UN High Level Plenary Meeting 2014

and the

Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth

Statement of Tupac Enrique Acosta, Huehuecoyotl

Callpolli Nahuacalco, Izkaloteka

In the Spirit of the Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth



Good greetings to you all:


To the ancestors and the Nations of Indigenous Peoples of these territories, to the Memory and Spirit of each of the Indigenous Peoples of Tonantzin, Our Sacred Mother Earth now in attendance, to the members of the UN Permanent Forum and all the support staff at this 13th Session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.

A special greeting and congratulations to our Chairperson, Ms. Dalee Sambo Dorough and also a word of recognition for the deceased leaders and spiritual guides of our Nations of Indigenous Peoples who led the way in the struggle in the international arena for recognition, respect, and protection for the rights of Indigenous Peoples. We invoke their vision and strength once again here today, we call upon the leadership of Billy Frank, we call upon the strength of Tomas Banyacya, and all the others relatives of our Indigenous Peoples who acted upon the responsibility for our future in their time.




Fundamental to the right of nationality, as members of the Nations of Indigenous Peoples of Abya Yala, the Great Turtle Island which is referenced in article 6 of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and evidenced unequivocally by the Treaty Status, namely international personality which was subject of the UN Treaty Study conducted by Miguel Alfonso Martinez, is the collective right of nationhood of Indigenous Peoples beyond the contextual constraints of the Westphalian system of sovereignty of states.  It is a collective right, similar to how the present UN system of mutual international recognition as sovereign states provides the framework of jurisprudence for the purported jurisdiction of the states individually and then collectively at the global dimension under the dominion of the UN system, the jurisprudence which articulates the nationhood of Indigenous Peoples is also is a projection of jurisdiction at the planetary level, with mutual responsibilities towards the Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth, and the well being of the Future Generations.  The distinction being that our Rights of Nationhood emerge from the COGNITION, and then thus RECOGNITION, of our responsibilities as ONE of the Nations (two legged species of kindom) – among ALL of the RELATIONS to whom and with we share as human society collectively, the responsibility to act in complementarity within the equally shared environment of the Natural World.


We are Original Nations of Mother Earth, and will not consent to be diminished or to be dominated under the regime of the government states of the UN system as mere ethnic groups, or minorities.



In addressing the issue of the UN High Level Plenary Meeting 2014, it is necessary to recall and clarify the fundamental principles which provide context for the discussion. 


The UN General Assembly High-level Plenary Meeting 2014 is Not a UN Conference.


“You can’t wake somebody up who is pretending to be asleep.”

The passage of UN GA1514 in 1960 marks the wakeup call to the age of decolonization in terms of the UN system.  In consequence, UN GA1541 (1960) which outlined the criteria identifying “non-self governing territories” under section 73(e) of the UN charter also set the framework for the UN Decolonizing Committee which although still operational now some 54 years later, has yet to address substantively the violations of International Law in terms of the Right of Self Determination of Indigenous Peoples within the UN procedures for decolonization.


With the adoption of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007, the recognition of Indigenous Peoples as Peoples, equal to all other peoples, establishes for the first time in UN protocols, including the procedures of decolonization, the mandate that all UN programs and plans of action must abide by this standard without exception and that the UN itself is honor bound to uphold the recognition, respect and protection of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, equal to all other peoples.


The Alta Outcome document of 2013 proclaims unequivocally that the UN HLPM 2014 must be realized in the spirit of full and equal participation of Indigenous Peoples.  Again the principle of equality in participation is in terms of equality as Peoples, equal to all other peoples.


In terms of the foregoing context, addressing the UN resolution bringing forward the call to convene in High Level Plenary Meeting and simultaneous announce that this plenary would be “known as the World Conference on Indigenous Peoples” the questions must be asked “By whom? And, why?”


·  At this point allow me to report to this assembly of the UNPFII that when the question was asked during the deliberations of the Global Indigenous Peoples Caucus conducted on the margins of this years session, “Who among us as Indigenous Peoples has given free, prior and informed consent to name the UN HLPM 2014 as a World Conference on Indigenous Peoples?” When the questioned was asked there was total silence in response and NO ONE came forward in the affirmative.


The concept of a world conference on Indigenous Peoples, when it was first introduced by the Government of Bolivia was an interesting concept. It is an interesting concept, and it will continue to be an interesting concept in the future. But unless the principles of Respect for the Right of Self Determination, Free Prior and Informed Consent, and Equality as Peoples, equal to all other peoples is firmly established in the conception, design, implementation and evaluation of such a conference the result will be what we now have before us: a pretense, a form of international peonage for the Indigenous Peoples to accommodate not a participatory agenda but one that is extractive, discriminatory and unjust. 


In evaluating the UN HLPM 2014, the lack of respect and consideration to be considered in Equality as Peoples with all other Peoples in the proceedings is evident from conception, completely absent from the design, not even being considered in the implementation, and there are no mechanisms integrate equality in the evaluation of the HLPM 2014 which is not a UN conference. 


The Writing is on the Wall




The HLPM is a semiotic schema (doctrine) being constructed to contextualize the process of INDIGENOUS CONSENT inside the Westphalian System of the Divine Right of States in order to subvert and domesticate the Universal Human Right in International Law of Indigenous Peoples, equal to all other peoples of the world.


We deny consent.


Instead we propose, determine and recommend:


We call for the restitution of the primary source materials and testimony that was lent to the United Nations system as fundamental to the evidence in document form of the systemic (system to system) nature of the legal relationships between the Nations of Indigenous Peoples and the member states of the UN system for the purpose of the Treaty Study conducted by Dr. Miguel Alfonso Martinez of Cuba.


Such delivery, should be initial act of good faith in terms of the continuing process of systemic documentation among the Nations of Indigenous Peoples and the UN system prior to and as a necessary act of condition to allow for the full and effective participation of the Indigenous Peoples with the UN HLMP2014 on an equal basis and without systemic discrimination in the process of producing the Final Outcome Document of the High Level Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly 2014.
 
  

TONATIERRA

Tupac Enrique Acosta, Huehuecoyotl


Endorsers: Maya Vision - Centro Cultural Techantit

 


#TimeIsNow Mandate of the Indigenous Peoples
Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth

 

The jurisprudence which articulates the nationhood of Indigenous Peoples is also is a projection of jurisdiction at the planetary level, with mutual responsibilities towards the Territorial Integrity of Mother Earth, and the well-being of the Future Generations.  The distinction being that our Rights of Nationhood emerge from the COGNITION, and then thus RECOGNITION, of our responsibilities as ONE of the Nations (two legged species of kindom) – among ALL of the RELATIONS to whom and with we share as human society collectively, the responsibility to act in complementarity within the equally shared environment of the Natural World.  We are Original Nations of Mother Earth, and will not consent to be diminished or to be dominated under the regime of the government states of the UN system as mere ethnic groups, or minorities.




No comments:

Post a Comment