Mexico City, April 1, 2022
Lic. Andrés Manuel López Obrador President of the United States of Mexico
For public opinion
Why we oppose the Maya Train
“Not ignore the principle of prior, free and informed consultation of the local indigenous communities to be affected as required by ILO Convention 169 on Indigenous and Tribal Peoples”; This may not be substituted by any “national consultation” and must be carried out in a transparent manner and under the observation of a commission that has no conflict of interest”.
However, we were not heard and today the so called Maya Train, promoted by your
government is being built in violation of the self determination of the Mayan
peoples and communities that ancestrally have inhabited this territory; without
the explicit consent of the peoples and communities and without consulting
experts in whom the people of Mexico have invested large amounts of resources
to generate knowledge about the bio cultural heritage of the nation.
At this
moment, the construction of the Maya Train has impacted the life ways,
biodiversity, sustainability, environmental quality, the human rights and
survival of the peoples and communities that inhabit the entire region which
the project claims to benefit. In light of the gravity of irreversible damage
that is being done and the lack of response to our petition to stop the project
and to open a space of dialogue, we present our reasons once again.
1. This territory, inhabited by the Mayan peoples since ancestral times, has generated life ways, customs, world views and ways of communal production and subsistence that respect ecological conditions and optimize the potential of their territories; these do not coincide with the ideals of progress, profit and urbanization that the Maya Train project promotes. To the contrary, these life ways are violated and the threat posed points toward the extinction of a great civilization that has managed to maintain its unique logic and cosmovision despite clashes with modernity and development. The harmonious co-existence of these cultures with other living beings is what has protected the Mayan jungle until now, sustaining bio cultural diversity and the equilibrium of ecosystems in their territories, including the contemporary version of Mayan culture in resistance to the encroachment of the colonization/modernization project driven by the destructive accumulation and dispossession wielded by the logic of Capital.
2. Evidence demonstrates that this territory was extensively occupied by the Mayan people and that a large portion of the information about the history and trajectory of this civilization is contained in the archeological buildings, remains and sites which will be destroyed in part by the project or damaged and altered as they are commoditized into tourist attractions. In both cases, the historic value of the sites and the possibility of finding in them keys to the long duration of Mayan civilization and culture with current meaning for contemporary Mayans is destroyed. The lack of knowledge about local social cultural practices, gives rise to the commoditization of heritage being seen as an “economic” opportunity. The phase “ethnocide can have a positive side: ethno-development”, from the official MIA document for the first section of the project implies that the termination of cultural practices in a region is considered advantageous for the indigenous population that “modernizes” by working in resorts with Mayan names but in reality is already causing displacement of population, land speculation and de-structuring of communities.
3. The Yucatán peninsula is a platform whose terrain was formed by the chemical weathering of sedimentary limestone rocks known as karst, giving the ground a fragile and breakable condition that is not adequate to support fast, heavy trains transporting tourists, products and hydrocarbons.
4. Karstic soil, porous and permeable, has led to the creation of a complex underground hydrological system that stores one of the most important aquifers in Mexico: some estimates say that it contains 33% of the nations’ water; right now, it is already being impacted by construction of the Maya Train.
5. Excessive use and contamination of the subterranean water and the increase in untreated, inorganic waste already threaten the water supply and increase the danger of salinization of the aquifer with the imminent risk of producing droughts and generalized desertification. This process will multiply with the urbanization and productive activities promoted by the Maya Train.
6. The largest system of subterranean caves and rivers in the world lays beneath the peninsular soil where unique ecosystems flourish and human remains dating 13,500 years old, in cases that have already been studied, are conserved. Chicxulub, the Ring of Cenotes formed by the impact of a meteor 70 million years ago, is a storehouse of endemic wildlife and geological information unlike any other in the world. This entire system could be impacted by the construction of the Maya Train.
7. The bio cultural wealth of this region has planetary relevance. Quintana Roo has the largest sweet water bacterial reefs in the world and along its coasts is the second longest coral reef in the world. Many of these caves house large bat populations that are irreplaceable disease controllers, seed dispersers and pollinizers. Its ecosystems are home to other valuable and threatened species such as the jaguar, the white lipped peccary, and innumerable species of freshwater fish, birds and insects. The development poles planned as part of the Maya Train place them at risk.
8. The ecosystems of the Yucatán peninsula have been recognized as some of the most bio diverse, providing multiple ecosystem services to the region and the planet. 54% of the nations mangroves are found along its coastlines, sequestering 60% of the blue carbon needed to mitigate the damage that greenhouse gases contribute to the global warming of the planet.
9. The health of coastal mangroves, wetlands, coral and bacterial reefs known as stromatolites, dunes, marine grasses and jungles depend on the subterranean waters and the network of ecosystems that develop there. At the same time, these ecosystems reduce the vulnerability of the population to climate change. The damage that economic activities such as tourism, fish farms and agro-industry have done should urgently lead to ecological restoration projects. To the contrary, the Maya Train is a driver of productive activities that worsen the socio-ecological deterioration of the Yucatán peninsula.
10. In the last decades, coral coverage has reduced dramatically to just 10% of its potential extension, diseases in the coral have increased and coverage of macro-algae has also reduced as a result of massive tourism and the increase in livestock and agro-industrial activities. The increase in tourism with the Maya Train will worsen all of these conditions.
11. In the Bacalar Lagoon, in southern Quintana Roo, lack of treatment for residual water, the excessive increase of unsustainable tourism, deforestation, and the use of chemical fertilizer for intensive agriculture have produced environmental changes that affect the health of bacterial reefs and has diminished the variety of colors in the lagoon.
12. In the state of Yucatán, 80% of the natural vegetation has been disturbed. Much of this vegetation has been designated as “acahual”; a natural process of secondary succession guided by traditional practices of the people living in tropical ecosystems that generate biodiversity and constitutes the cultural patrimony of the communities. Therefore, these areas can be restored and the condition should not be used as an argument to intervene via means of appropriation that break the already fragile ecological equilibrium and sustainability of their territories.
13. The Maya Train will generate massive migration that will impact tropical forests which like other ecosystems are under pressure from population growth, cattle ranching, extensive agriculture, agribusiness and large scale tourism development.
14. The infrastructure for the Maya Train fragments the landscape, impeding the natural and indispensable mobility of species and producing irreversible damage to ecosystem services that sooner or later will affect the quality of life in urban centers and of local populations.
15. The tourism promoted by the Maya Train and the resulting accelerated and unplanned urbanization will impact lifeways, deteriorate sanitary conditions, generate excessive amounts of trash, and increase water consumption and contamination.
16. The touristic levels calculated, though not based on accurate forecasting, would have 3 million tourists passing through the jungle instead of the current 40 thousand (in the Calakmul route), creating barriers, noise, vibration and weight in addition to a difficult invasion for local residents to manage.
17. In reality, the train is a real estate and urbanization project disguised as responsible tourism that aspires to be the economic engine of the peninsula. However, this development model, approved in the Yucatán peninsula, has already impoverished the environment and increased socio-economic inequality in the region, exposing the most vulnerable to pay the enormous costs of environmental deterioration in exchange for precarious jobs. Despite all of this, this development model will be replicated with the same omissions and errors involving more cities and states. The Maya Train project creates short term construction jobs but does not consider the migratory phenomena to the urban centers.
18. With Cancún as a case in point, one can assume that the massification of touristic activities and locations will bring an increase drug trafficking and consumption of drugs not limited to the tourists but also on the part of young people in the region. As a result, we can assume an increase in violence, the potential for human trafficking and prostitution. All of this will definitively alter regional society in an irreversible and harmful way.
19. The lack of planning, discussion and evaluation that according to law, should have occurred related to this megaproject is an enormous concern. This results in route changes that multiply the eco-social damage and uselessly destroy communities and ecosystems beyond what the project required.
20. The Project is being carried out without the consent of communities and indigenous peoples, without consultation that meets requirements established by ILO Convention 169, without studies of soil and ground mechanics, without manifestations of environmental impact for the entire territory impacted by the project and some that are very deficient for some segments. In addition, there is no economic feasibility study and budgets are growing with no ability to demonstrate results.
Lastly, it is extremely troubling that the development of the Maya Train is under the command of the armed forces. In militarizing the process and construction of the megaproject, mechanisms to protect nature are further reduced and those who inhabit the region are placed in a situation of vulnerability.
For all of these reasons which we can support with facts and arguments, we remain opposed to the Maya Train project.
We demand that:
1. The government halt the Maya Train project.
2. A serious and careful evaluation is conducted on the impacts the project has caused.
3. Funding is designated for the social and ecological restoration of the region.
4. An in-depth conversation must place that includes the indigenous peoples and communities of the region as a priority, regarding the appropriateness of the Maya Train and other projects that proport to recover the environmental and cultural values of the Maya.
We are not pseudo scientists, conservationists nor adversaries. We are academics working in the field and in government with a deep commitment to the good of México as we have demonstrated for decades during which we have pointed out problems caused by government programs, corporate projects, unsustainable initiatives from any source, and we have also applauded the successes of government and businesses in the case of programs and projects that truly contribute to sustainability. Arguments like those presented here regarding the Maya Train have been raised by many of the signers of this document over the course of our trajectory and commitment to stop ecological degradation, militarization and colonization.
What we question is the criteria for development and progress that is no longer compatible with the sustainability of the planet, true democratic principles and the existential rights of the peoples of Mother Earth.
We reiterate that we do not seek confrontation rather a constructive dialogue that allows sustainable alternatives to be found that are respectful of ecological conditions, the culture and social reality of peoples and communities and guarantee a dignified and sustainable future for the future generations.
Sincerely,
Miguel Concha, Director General del Centro de Derechos Humanos Fray Francisco De Vitoria, O.P., A.C.
Homero Aridjis, Escritor, Presidente del Grupo de los Cien.
Ana Esther Ceceña, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, UNAM.
Luis Zambrano, Instituto de Biología, UNAM.
Luisa Falcón, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM, campus Mérida.
Enrique Leff, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, UNAM.
Rodrigo Medellín, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Cristina Barros, Investigadora independiente.
Jorge Herrera-Silveira, CINVESTAV, Mérida, IPN.
Gabriela Gaxiola, Coordinadora del Programa Camarón. Responsable académica de Nutrición UMDI-Sisal, Fac. de Ciencias, UNAM.
Alejandro Frank, Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM. Ángel Sulub, Centro Comunitario U kúuchil k Ch'i'ibalo'on.
Alejandra García Quintanilla, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán, Colectivo Popol wuj.
Ambrosio Velasco, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM.
Peter Rosset, Investigador independiente.
Ofelia Medina, Actriz y defensora de los derechos humanos de las comunidades indígenas.
Marisol Anglés, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM.
Magdalena Gómez, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Teresa Rojas Rabiela, CIESAS.
Elisa Cruz Rueda, Escuela de Autodesarrollo Indígena, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas.
Luca Ferrari, Centro de Geociencias, UNAM, campus Juriquilla.
Xavier Chiappa-Carrara, Director ENES-Mérida, UNAMEfraín León, Coordinador del Posgrado en Estudios
Latinoamericanos, UNAM.
Antonio García de León, INAH.
Sergio Madrid, Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible.
Francisco López Bárcenas, El Colegio de San Luis.
Mariana Alvarez, Coordinadora de la Licenciatura en Ecología, Escuela Nacional de Estudios Superiores, UNAM, Unidad Mérida.
Betzabeth Palafox, EcoSur, Chetumal.
Rosalva Aida Hernández, investigadora del CIESAS, CDMX.
Jorge Fernández Souza, Abogado, Investigador independiente.
Jorge Alonso, profesor investigador del Ciesas Occidente.
Lorenzo Alvarez-Filip, Unidad de Sistemas Arrecifales, UNAM
Patricia Thomé Ortiz, Instituto de Ciencias Del Mar y Limnología, UNAM.
Felipe I. Echenique Marcha, INAH.
José Maria Calderón Rodríguez, FCPyS, UNAM.
Margara Millán, FCPyS, UNAM.
Ana de Ita, Centro de Estudios para el Cambio en el Campo Mexicano.
Teresa Alvarez Legorreta, Departamento de Ciencias de la Sustentabilidad, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur. Miguel
Ángel García Aguirre, Maderas del Pueblo.
Javier Barros del Villar, Asociado al Laboratorio de Conciencia Digital Fulvipo Eccardi, Independiente.
Fernanda Paz, CRIM, UNAM.
Dulce María Ramos Mora, Universidad Iberoamericana.
Alejandra Prieto Davó, Facultad de Química, Unidad Sisal, UNAM.
Enrique Rajchenberg, Facultad de Economía, UNAM.
Gilberto López y Rivas, profesor investigador del INAH Morelos.
Alicia Castellanos Guerrero, UAM Iztapalapa.
Casandra Reyes García, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY).
Alma Gpe. Melgarito Rocha, Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.
Raúl Ornelas, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, UNAM.
Federico Fernández Christlieb, Instituto de Geografía, UNAM.
Sergio Prieto Díaz, Laboratorio de Investigaciones Transfronterizas.
Claudio García Ehrenfeld, Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM. Catherine Heau Lambert, ENAH.
Gustavo Alanís, profesor de Derecho Ambiental de la Universidad Iberoamericana (UIA) de la Ciudad de México.
Romel González, Coordinador de Capacitación del CRIPX y Coordinador de la Escuela de Defensores Comunitarios y Buen Vivir del CRIPX.
Aldo Gonzalez, UNOSJO, Sierra Juárez de Oaxaca.
Sylvia Marcos, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Morelos, Red de feminismos descoloniales.
Rosa María Garza Marcué, DEAS, INAH.
Tania Ramírez González, Jaguar Wildlife Center A.C. Ignacio Chapela, University of California, Berkekey.
Arturo Escobar, Profesor emerito de antropologia, Universidad de Carolina del Norte, Chapel Hill.
José Antonio Foronda Farro, Tribunal Internacional de Conciencia de los Pueblos en Movimiento (TICPM) y Prevención, Capacitación y Defensa del Migrante, A C. (PRECADEM).
Joaquín Asterio Aguilar Chan, Asociación Promotora del Ambiente Sustentable A.C. Héctor Hernández-Arana, ECOSUR Chetumal
Eliana Acosta, INAH.
David Barrios Rodríguez, Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, UNAM. Servando Gaja, Cineasta.
Cristina Steffen, UAM.
Luis Tamayo Pérez, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro. Manuel Elías Gutiérrez, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.
Esteban Ortiz Rodea, Doctorante en Sostenibilidad. Flor Mercedes Rodríguez Zornoza, UACM.
Hernán Correa Ortíz, UACM.
Aida Luz López, UACM.
Juan Manuel Dupuy Rada, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY). Patricia Ornelas, IBUNAM.
Luz María Calvo Irabien, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY). Cristina Mapes, IB, UNAM.
Larisa de Orbe Academia Mexicana de Derecho Ambiental Gerardo Pérez Ponce de León, ENES, UNAM, Mérida.
María Azucena Canto Aguilar, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY). Mariana Chávez Pesqueira, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY).
Rodrigo Duno de Stefano, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY). Astrid Schilmann, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública.
Marlene Cortez Lugo, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Horacio Riojas Rodríguez, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Magali Hurtado Díaz, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública.
Germán Carnevali Fernández-Concha, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY). Ivón Mercedes Ramírez Morillo, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY).
Javier Orlando Mijangos Cortés, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY). José Luis Hernández Stefanoni, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY). Uri Ramírez Vázquez, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY).
Rodrigo T. Patiño Díaz, CINVESTAV, Unidad Mérida. Tania Paola Vázquez Delfín, ENES, Morelia.
Sofía Riojas Paz, ENCRyM, INAH. Aideé Tassinari Azcuaga, UACM. Mariana Elkisch, UACM.
Mina Lorena Navarro, BUAP.
Gabriela Wiener Castillo, Arquitecta paisajista, Centro de investigaciones de Arquitectura, Urbanismo y Paisaje, UNAM.
Carlota Guzmán, CRIM, UNAM.
Karla Borges, Instituto de Ecología, A.C. José Cú, Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
Luis Fueyo Mac Donald, Consultor.
Enrique Martínez Meyer, Instituto de Biología, UNAM.
Ella Vazquez, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM. Elena Tudela, Facultad de Arquietctura, UNAM. Gabriela Parra, Instituto de Biologia, UNAM. Claudia Ortíz, Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM.
Dario Azzellini, Unidad Académica de Estudios del Desarrollo, UAZ. Josué García Veiga, Facultad de Economía, UNAM.
Jorge Galindo Gonzalez, Universidad Veracruzana. Valeria Towns, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM. Celene Espadas, CICY.
Claudia Teuti Hernández, ENES, UNAM, Mérida.
Celia Selem Salas, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY).
Sergio Guillen Hernández, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY). Gerardo García Gil, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY).
Javier Sosa Escalante, CEGES.
Maria Jose Luna, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY).
Cindy Renata Molina Corona, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY). Marby Gabriela Kumul Balam, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY). Reyna Cristina Palma Chim, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY).
Ricarda Schlittgen, Profesora investigadora independiente.
Emilio H. Taddei, Universidad de Buenos Aires; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Instituto de Estudios de América Latina y el Caribe (IEALC); Grupo de Estudios sobre América Latina y el Caribe (GEAL).
Edgar Emmanuel Nahuat Yama, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY).
José Ignacio Torres Balan, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY).
Cassandra Garrido Cabrera, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán (UADY).
José Eduardo Broca Lara, Centro de Estudios Tecnológicos del Mar.
Camille Chalmers, Profesor UEH, Director PAPDA Haïtí Sandra Jazmin Barragan Contreras, Universidad de Sheffield. Edgar G. Ávila Luna, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Rocío Santos Gally, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Patricia Magaña Rueda, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Clementina Equihua Zamora, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Nadia S. Santini, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Ma. Cristina Rodríguez Juárez, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Marisa Mazari Hiriart, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Graciela García Guzmán, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Hugh Drummond Durey, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Carlos Galindo Leal.
Francisco Molina Freaner, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Claudia Moreno Arzate, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Rubén Pérez Ishiwara, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Constantino Macías García, Instituto de Ecología, UNAM.
Leonora Torres-Knoop, Bioconciencia. A.C.
Paloma Zubieta López, Instituto de Matemáticas, UNAM.
Xavier López Medellín, CIBYC, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.
Eduardo Eugenio Iñigo Elías, Investigador Independiente en Biología y Conservación Tropical.
Oswaldo Téllez Valdés, UBIPRO, FES Iztacala, UNAM.
Rafael Ávila Flores, UJAT.
Arturo Barba Pingarrón, Facultad de Ingeniería, UNAM.
Carlos Ávila, Unión de Científicos Comprometidos con la Sociedad.
Eduardo Alberto Pérez García, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM.
Jorge López Portillo, INECOL.
Jorge Galindo González, Universidad Veracruzana.
Ady P. Carrera Hernández, Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla (UPAEP).
Alberto Arellano, Profesor-investigador en El Colegio de Jalisco.
Ignacio Lozano Moheno, CIDE.
Emanuel Ramírez Arellanes, Universidad de la Sierra del Sur. Jorge Lamas Carlos, Universidad de la Sierra del Sur.
María Gabriela Martínez Tiburcio, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Sede Lerma.
Lidia Blásquez Martínez, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Sede Lerma.
Héctor Eduardo Jardón Valadez, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Sede Lerma.
Anne Laure Sabine Bussy Beaurain, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Sede Lerma.
Leticia Santín del Río, FCPyS, UNAM.
Alberto Gallardo, Universidad Iberoamericana.
Roberto Munguía-Steyer, FES Iztacala, UNAM.
Paul Hersch Martínez, INAH, Morelos.
Elda Miriam Aldasoro Maya, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.
Limbania Vásquez Nava, Colectiva Entramados para la Vida, Defendiendo Territorios.
Carla Zamora Lomelí, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.
Natalia Manzano León, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología.
Antonio de la Torre, Bioconciencia, AC.
Mónica Itzel Fernández Santiago, Siempre Unidas Muchuuk Balo’on A.C. Karla Borges, Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
José Cú, Instituto de Ecología, A.C.
Ma. Eugenia Sánchez Díaz de Rivera. Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla.
Inés Durán Matute, ICSyH-BUAP / IRGAC-RLS
Antonia Candela, CINVESTAV, IPN.
Fernanda Lases Hernández, Facultad de Química UNAM, Campus Yucatán.
Miguel Ignacio Rivas Bejarano, Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM.
Sandy Ramírez, Posgrado de Estudios Latinoamericanos, UNAM.
Cristobal Reyes Núñez, Escuela Superior de Economía, IPN.
Ek del Val, IIES, UNAM.
Mayra Elena Gavito Pardo, IIES, UNAM.
Lena Abrenna, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM.
Lina Odena Güemes, ENAH.
Cecilia Vázquez Ahumada, ENAH.
Elsa Hernández Pons, Coordinación Nacional de Monumentos Históricos, INAH.
Lilián González Chevez, UAEM.
Selene Aldana Santana, FCPyS, UNAM.
María Azucena Canto Aguilar, CICY.
Sara Cuervo Vega, Consejo Civil Mexicano de Silvicultura.
Mónica Pallares Trujillo, UNAM.
Josefina Mansilla Lory, INAH.
Eduardo Alberto Pérez García, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM.
Fernando Cortés de Brasdefer, INAH.
Julio Muñoz Rubio.
Óscar Flores Herrera, UNAM.
Eduardo Alberto Pérez García, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
Luz María Calvo Irabien, CICY.
Yazmín Fernández, Universidad Veracruzana.
Mariana Chávez Pesqueira, CICY.
Josefina Mansilla Lory, INAH.
Javier Mijangos Cortés, CICY.
Verónica Briseño Castrejón, Universidad de Calgary. Fernando Calderón Gutiérrez, Universidad Galveston.
María Teresa Sandoval-Schaefer, Universidad de Yale.
Jorge Peláez Padilla, Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de México.
Ma. Andrea Trejo Marquez, UNAM.
Margarita Muñoz Rubio, Escuela Nacional de Música, UNAM.
Ana Laura Wegier Briuolo, Instituto de Biología, UNAM. Sabina Lara, Universidad Michoacana.
Paola Vázquez Delfín, ENES, UNAM.
Esperanza Basurto, FCPyS, UNAM.
Noemi Castillo Tejero, INAH.
Lilián González Chevez, Universidad Autónoma de Morelos.
Alberto Hidalgo, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM.
Elena Coral Mota Green, Estudiante de Ciencias Ambientales.
Cassandra Cárdenas Pimentel, Promoción Cultural.
Angelina Deyanira Navarro, FCPyS, UNAM.
Susana Og, ECOSUR.
María de Jesús Ordóñez, CRIM, UNAM.
Manuel May Castillo, Ka’ Kuxtal Much Meya.
Francisco Alexis Oyhu, Universidad Intercultural Maya de Quintana Roo.
Fernando Álvarez, Instituto de Biología, UNAM
Lucía Linsalata, BUAP.
Cristina Ayala, Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM.
Aide Tassimari Ascoaga, UACM.
Francisco A España. UNAM.
Paulina Arroyo Gerala, Jaguares de la Selva Maya A.C.
Francisco Zúñiga, CIGA, UNAM.
Alejandra M. Blanco Macías, UNAM.
Diana Villalobos, UAEM.
Uri Yael Ramírez Vázquez, CICY.
Germán Carnevali Fernández Concha, CiCY.
Gisselle García Maning, Universidad Iberoamericana.
Rosa Odavia Ángeles Cornejo, UACM.
Francisco Zúñiga, Fac Ciencias, UNAM.
Monserrat Virginia González Montaño, ENTS, UNAM.
María de Jesús Ordoñez, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias, UNAM.
José Luis Mariño.
Gilberto López Castillo, INAH.
Patricia Colunga García-Marín, Investigadora independiente,
Yucatán.
Mónica del Villar K., Investigadora independiente.
Tania Andrade Olea, Bordadoras por la Paz.
María del Pilar Ponce Jiménez, INAH. Fidelmar Munguia Bejar.
Marcela A. Jiménez Martinez.
Rafael Cervantes Ramirez, Universidad La Salle.
Georgina Rosado Rosado, UADY.
Gisela Maldonado Saldaña, Grupo Tortuguero del Caribe.
Manolo Maas, Instituto de Investigación en Ecosistemas y Sostenibilidad, UNAM.
Fernando Álvarez, Instituto de Biología, UNAM.
Betty Ferber, Coordinadora Internacional, Grupo de los Cien. Artemia Fabre Zarandona, Diálogo y Movimiento, A.C.
María Elena Hernández Hernández, Defensora Comunitaria del CRIPX.
Ariana Escalante, Articulación Yucatán.
Ivet Reyes, Articulación Yucatán.
Jazmín Sánchez, Articulación Yucatán.
Bety Cariño, Centro de Derechos Humanos de los Pueblos del Sur de Veracruz.
Viridiana Maldonado, CEMDA.
Rubén Jaramillo Méndez, Instituto Cultural Autónomo.
Antonio Sarmiento Galán, Instituto de Matemáticas, UNAM.
Oralba Castillo Nájera, Red Morelense de Apoyo al CIN, CIG.
Carlos Chablé Mendoza, Periodista.
Patricia Godínez, Moce Yax Cuxtal A.C.
Raúl Perez Ríos, SUTIEMS.
Sara López González, Si a la vida no a la muerte.
Consuelo Bonfil, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM.
Gisela Maldonado Saldaña, Grupo Tortuguero del Caribe.
María Cristina Verónica García Aguirre.
Norma Isela Rodríguez Ramírez.
Teresa Carmona Lobo.
Elsa Ávila.
Jorge Zambrano González.
Rodolfo García Chávez.
Mónica Del Villar, Independiente.
Diego Ávila Ruiz.
Guillermo Rodríguez.
Mario E. Vázquez.
Salvador Tejeda.
Irma Rodríguez Sosa.
Javier Andrés Juárez Díaz. Jaime de Lira.
Ignacio Eguiarte Terreros. Roberto R. Contreras.
Cecilia García. Mónica Rodríguez.
Luis Fernando Rivera Rodríguez. Verónica Munier Jolain.
Ma. Del Carmen Camarillo Gómez. Rafael de Pina.
Lucia Salas.
Jose Remolina.
Abraham Villaseñor.
Elia Andrade Olea, Bordadoras por la Paz.
Bellanira López Sánchez.
Andrea Martha Flores Osorio.
Lorenzo Itzá.
Marco Polo Hernández Santiago.
Ignacio Piña Espallargas.
Marcos Tello Chávez.
Beatriz Vela.
Maddy Vassallo.
Gonzalo Munguía del Río.
Guillermo Molina Villegas. Fulvio Eccardi
Luz Emilia Aguilar Zinzer Karla Victoria Rincón Peña Mariana Mora.
Elisa Genoveva Peña Treviño.
Miriam Moreno Sánchez.
Coral Hero, Mujer Libre Mx La Fuerza de Ixchel.
René Espejel.
Organizaciones
Múuch Xíinbal
Maderas del Pueblo del Sureste, AC.
Comité Nacional para la Defensa y Conservación de Los Chimalapas.
Observatorio Latinoamericano de Geopolítica.
Asamblea de Pueblos Indígenas del Istmo en Defensa de la Tierra.
Unión de Organizaciones de la Sierra Juárez Oaxaca, S. C. Mexicanos Unidos.
Red de Resistencia y Rebeldía Tlalpan.
Huerto Roma Verde.
La Cuadra A.C.
Extinction Rebellion, México.
Asociación Mexicana de Abogados del Pueblo (AMAP-Gro).
Colectiva Zurciendo el Planeta.
Guerreros Verdes.
Centro de Estudios para el Cambio en el Campo Mexicano (CECCAM).
Brigadas Emiliano Zapata de México (BEZ-MÉX).
Colectivo Zapatista Neza
Colectivo Aequus, Promoción y Defensa de Derechos Humanos.
Grupo Gema del Mayab, A. C.
U Yo'ol Lúum.
Agenda de las Mujeres por la Igualdad Sustantiva en Yucatán (AMISY).
No comments:
Post a Comment